대문글

MileMoa

검색
×

마일모아 게시판   [잡담]
재미난 (?) 뉴스 - $6.4 million in credit-card charges for 5% Reward

Respond | 2021.03.09 22:01:53 | 본문 건너뛰기 | 댓글 건너뛰기 쓰기

제가 읽는 뉴스레터에서 공유된 기사인데, 마모 회원님들 중에 이런 실험을 해보신 분들이 있을까 하여 공유합니다.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/he-got-300-000-from-credit-card-rewards-the-irs-said-it-was-taxable-income-11615125601

 

"Konstantin Anikeev, an experimental physicist, assembled everything he needed for an inquiry far outside his field."

 

"Exploit the difference between unlimited 5% rewards and lower fees on gift cards and money orders. Mr. Anikeev’s financial-optimization plan in 2013 and 2014—including $6.4 million in credit-card charges—led to an Internal Revenue Service audit and a finding that he and his wife had more than $310,000 in income that should have been taxed."

 

5% 리워드 주는 크레딧카드로 $6.4 Million 을 결제한 뒤 $300,000+ 리워드를 챙겼는데 IRS에서 세금 내놔라 해서 소송이 붙었던 모양입니다.

 

"His American Express card offered unlimited 5% rewards at grocery stores and pharmacies after he had spent $6,500. So Mr. Anikeev used his AmEx card to buy prepaid Visa gift cards at grocery stores, routinely stopping during his commute and purchasing the maximum allowed per day at a store. He often used the gift cards to buy money orders, then used the money orders to make deposits in his bank account, then used that money to pay his credit-card bill."

 

출퇴근 길에 가게에 들려 살 수 있는 만큼 최대한 사고. 기프트 카드 -> 머니 오더 -> 계좌 디파짓 이렇게 했네요.

 

"Judge Goeke issued a split ruling. Rewards earned on purchases of Visa gift cards aren’t taxable, he ruled, because the cards are products; most but not all of Mr. Anikeev’s transactions happened that way. Rewards earned on purchases of money orders or reloading debit cards are taxable, the judge determined. The IRS already says rewards can be taxable if they are earned without spending, such as a bonus for opening a bank account."

 

판사는 반반의 판결을 내렸지만, IRS 입장에서 좀 더 진 것 같아 보입니다.

 

마지막으로 판사의 입장문 내용 중 일부를 공유합니다.

 

"This policy reflects the recognition that a taxpayer who avails himself or herself of a discount in acquiring goods and services has no accession to wealth. That taxpayer has retained more of his or her wealth than a taxpayer who pays full price for the same good or service, but that taxpayer has no additional income; he or she simply has reduced consumption. Although as Benjamin Franklin wisely observed, “[a] penny saved is two pence clear” (which became known more colloquially as “a penny saved is a penny earned”), the income tax law imposes a tax only on the future penny earned, not on the current penny saved."

 

세상은 넓고 참 다양한 사람들이 있는 것 같습니다.

 

 

 

댓글 [11]

목록 스크랩

마일모아 게시판 [114,329] 분류

쓰기
1 / 5717
마일모아 사이트 맞춤 구글 검색